Austin Location
608 West 12th Street, Suite B Austin, TX 78701
Georgetown Location
706 Rock St, Georgetown, TX 78626
Expunction destroys the record. Non-disclosure seals it. Different statutes, different eligibility rules, different practical effects. The choice between them is not yours to make — Texas law decides which one your case qualifies for, and in most cases, only one of them is available.
This page explains the difference, the eligibility rules under Article 55A.101 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and Texas Government Code Chapter 411, Subchapter E-1, and how to figure out which one applies to your case.
Expunction is a court order that requires designated law enforcement agencies to destroy all the records in their possession pertaining to the arrest. Every government agency that holds a file on the arrest must destroy or return it. After the order takes effect, you can legally deny the arrest occurred — on employment applications, housing applications, and most professional licensing forms. Federal and immigration contexts have separate rules under federal law.
Practical note for clients in immigration proceedings: If you have your attorney expunge an arrest record while you are in the midst of immigration proceedings, have your attorney hold a copy of all pertinent case documents. Immigration Courts require disclosure of certain reports, and many people have discovered the hard way that once a case is expunged, retrieving those necessary documents becomes impossible.
Non-disclosure is a court order that seals the record from the public. Most employers, landlords, and background-check vendors cannot see it. Law enforcement, prosecutors, licensing boards, school districts, medical boards, and certain regulated employers still can.
For the most part, the rule is this: if you completed a deferred adjudication probation successfully, after a statutory waiting period (usually two years for misdemeanors and five years for a felony), you become eligible for non-disclosure.
If you qualify for an expunction, you want the expunction. It is the more complete remedy and there is no situation where a non-disclosure is better when both are available. The reason most people end up with a non-disclosure is that an expunction is not available to them.
Expunction eligibility under Article 55A.101 is limited to specific paths:
Each path has its own waiting period. An arrest that was never charged runs on the statute of limitations: 180 days for most Class C misdemeanors, two years for Class A and B misdemeanors, three years for most felonies. A dismissal can usually be filed for expunction once any appeal period has run and prosecution is off the table.
One narrow exception to the no-conviction rule. In certain cases, a conviction for a Class C misdemeanor pertaining to underage drinking (Minor in Possession or Minor in Consumption) may be expunged under the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code. Under current law, this is the sole exception to the general rule that convictions cannot be expunged.
The common scenarios that disqualify you from expunction:
Non-disclosure eligibility is governed by Texas Government Code Chapter 411, Subchapter E-1. The general rule: if you successfully completed deferred adjudication on a qualifying offense, you may petition the court to seal the record after the applicable waiting period.
Waiting periods vary by offense category:
Some offenses are categorically barred from non-disclosure regardless of outcome — including murder, capital murder, aggravated kidnapping, certain sex offenses, family violence with serious bodily injury, and offenses requiring registration as a sex offender.
What expunction does that non-disclosure does not:
Non-disclosure basics:
What both share:
Kenneth Hines leads expunction and non-disclosure filings at the firm. Every petition filed at the firm goes through the same process. The case file is reviewed by all three attorneys at weekly case-review meetings. Kenneth handles drafting and the hearing. The firm files the petition, serves every required agency, appears at the hearing, and ensures that all appropriate law enforcement agencies are included in the order.
Travis, Williamson, Hays, Bell, Burnet, Gillespie, Blanco, Bastrop, Caldwell, and Comal Counties.
Flat fee, no hourly billing, no surprise add-ons. The fee covers preparation, filing fees, service fees on all agencies, the hearing, and providing the client with a certified copy of the signed order.
District clerk filing fees (currently in the $300 to $400 range depending on county) are included in the flat fee.
From engagement to filing is typically a week or less. It can take additional time if the clerk of court has to retrieve a particularly old file from storage. From filing to hearing is typically 35 to 60 days depending on the court’s docket. The order takes effect immediately after the judge signs, but DPS and the commercial background-check vendors take additional time to update their databases. By statute, no agency may still hold records 12 months after the date the expunction order is signed.
The honest answer is that the question is rarely as simple as “expunction or non-disclosure.” It depends on how your case resolved, what charge you pleaded to or were convicted of, what waiting periods apply, and whether your case falls into one of the categorical bars.
A free consultation is the fastest way to find out. We pull the case disposition, identify which statutory path applies, and tell you the timeline and cost before you decide whether to hire the firm.
Call (512) 369-3737. Available 24 hours.
David D. White founded the Law Office of David D. White, PLLC and has practiced criminal defense exclusively since 2004. The firm represents clients across Travis, Williamson, Hays, Caldwell, Lee, Coryell, Bell, Burnet, Milam, and Bastrop counties. Three attorneys handle each case as a team — weekly case reviews and shared Clio notes — and by the first consultation, the firm has obtained the Probable Cause Affidavit, read it, and identified the state’s evidentiary weak points.
This page was written and reviewed by the attorneys at the Law Office of David D. White, PLLC, following our editorial guidelines. The firm has practiced criminal defense exclusively since 2004 across Travis, Williamson, Hays, Caldwell, Lee, Coryell, Bell, Burnet, Milam, and Bastrop County courts. The firm’s three attorneys — David White (managing attorney, practicing criminal defense exclusively since 2004), Kenneth Hines (associate, practicing Caldwell County courts since 2008; former General Counsel to the Texas Senate Jurisprudence Committee, 2010–2012), and Taylor Kacir (associate; former Senior Misdemeanor County Attorney, Bell County Attorney’s Office) — work each case as a team via weekly case reviews and shared Clio notes.
608 West 12th Street, Suite B Austin, TX 78701
706 Rock St, Georgetown, TX 78626